









|
|
|
MS4 Permit |
The MS4 permit requires regulated municipal MS4s (See Maps)
to develop and fully implement a stormwater management program by 2008. Stormwater management
programs must contain appropriate management practices in each of the six minimum control measures outlined below.
|
| NOI and Annual Reports |
As a first step toward obtaining SPDES permit coverage regulated MS4s were required to submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) form to DEC by March 10, 2003. The NOI required MS4s to provide an initial outline of planned management practices and to submit subsequent Annual Reports to assess progress toward the full implementation of an appropriate
stormwater management plan. Please note that there is a different format for the Years 3-5 Annual Report. Click here to see a list of the forms.
|
Six Minimum Control Measures |
The following sections detail the requirements of each minimum control measure and outline some activities and/or practices that can be used to fulfill these requirements. MS4s should check the final permit for full program responsibilities and requirements. To see the original EPA document, and for the purposes of printing and/or distribution, click on the name of the control measure.
|
|
|
2.3 Public Education and Outreach
|
For supporting materials to assist with this measure please see the Educational section of this website.
Requirements:
To satisfy this minimum control measure, the operator of a regulated small MS4 needs to: |
|
| • | Implement a public education program to distribute educational materials to the
community, or conduct equivalent outreach activities about the impacts of storm
water discharges on local waterbodies and the steps that can be taken to reduce
storm water pollution; and |
| • | Determine the appropriate best management practices (BMPs) and measurable goals
for this minimum control measure. Some program implementation approaches,
BMPs (i.e., the program actions/activities), and measurable goals are suggested
below. | |
What Are Some Guidelines for Developing and Implementing This
Measure?
Three main action areas are important for successful implementation of a public education and outreach program:
1. Forming Partnerships
Operators of regulated small MS4s are encouraged to enter
into partnerships with other governmental entities to fulfill
this minimum control measure's requirements. It is generally
more cost-effective to use an existing program, or to develop a
new regional or state-wide education program, than to have
numerous operators developing their own local programs.
Operators also are encouraged to seek assistance from nongovernmental
organizations (e.g., environmental, civic, and
industrial organizations), since many already have educational
materials and perform outreach activities.
2. Using Educational Materials and Strategies
Operators of regulated small MS4s may use storm water
educational information provided by the U.S. EPA or the NYS DEC instead of developing their own materials. Operators should
strive to make their materials and activities relevant to local
situations and issues, and incorporate a variety of strategies to
ensure maximum coverage. Some examples include: |
|
| • | Brochures or fact sheets for general public and specific audiences; |
| • | Recreational guides to educate groups such as golfers, hikers, paddlers, climbers, fishermen, and campers; |
| • | Alternative information sources, such as web sites, bumper stickers, refrigerator magnets, posters for bus and subway stops, and restaurant placemats; |
| • | A library of educational materials for community and school groups; |
| • | Volunteer citizen educators to staff a public education task force; |
| • | Event participation with educational displays at home shows and community festivals; |
| • | Educational programs for school-age children; |
| • | Storm drain stenciling of storm drains with messages such as "Do Not Dump - Drains Directly to Lake;" |
| • | Storm water hotlines for information and for citizen reporting of polluters; |
| • | Economic incentives to citizens and businesses (e.g., rebates to homeowners purchasing mulching lawnmowers or biodegradable lawn products);and |
| • | Tributary signage to increase public awareness of local water resources. | |
3. Reaching Diverse Audiences
The public education program should use a mix of appropriate
local strategies to address the viewpoints and concerns of a
variety of audiences and communities, including minority and
disadvantaged communities, as well as children. Printing
posters and brochures in more than one language or posting
large warning signs (e.g., cautioning against fishing or
swimming) near storm sewer outfalls are methods that can be
used to reach audiences less likely to read standard materials.
Directing materials or outreach programs toward specific groups
of commercial, industrial, and institutional entities likely to
have significant storm water impacts is also recommended. For
example, information could be provided to restaurants on the
effects of grease clogging storm drains and to auto garages on
the effects of dumping used oil into storm drains.
| |
| What Are Appropriate Measurable Goals?
Measurable goals, which are required for each minimum
control measure, are intended to gauge permit compliance
and program effectiveness. The measurable goals, as well as
the BMPs, should reflect the needs and characteristics of the
operator and the area served by its small MS4. Furthermore,
they should be chosen using an integrated approach that fully
addresses the requirements and intent of the minimum control
measure. An integrated approach for this minimum measure
could include the following measurable goals:
|
|
|
|
| Target Date | Activity
|
| 1 year: | Brochures developed (bilingual, if appropriate) and distributed in water utility bills; a storm water hotline in place; volunteer educators trained. |
| 2 years: | A web site created; school curricula developed; storm drains stenciled. |
| 3 years: | A certain percentage of restaurants no longer dumping grease and other pollutants down storm sewer drains. |
| 4 years: | A certain percentage reduction in litter or animal waste detected in discharges. |
|
|
| Top of Page |
|
|
2.4 Public Participation and Involvement
|
Requirements:
To satisfy this minimum control measure, the operator of a regulated small MS4 must: |
|
| • | Comply with applicable State and local public notice requirements; and |
| • | Determine the appropriate best management practices (BMPs) and measurable goals
for this minimum control measure. Possible implementation approaches, BMPs
(i.e., the program actions and activities), and measurable goals are described below.
| |
What Are Some Guidelines for Developing and Implementing This
Measure?
Operators of regulated small MS4s should include the public
in developing, implementing, and reviewing their storm
water management programs. The public participation process
should make every effort to reach out and engage all economic
and ethnic groups. EPA recognizes that there are challenges
associated with public involvement. Nevertheless, EPA strongly
believes that these challenges can be addressed through an
aggressive and inclusive program. Challenges and example
practices that can help ensure successful participation are
discussed below.
Implementation Challenges
The best way to handle common notification and recruitment
challenges is to know the audience and think creatively about
how to gain its attention and interest. Traditional methods of
soliciting public input are not always successful in generating
interest, and subsequent involvement, in all sectors of the
community. For example, municipalities often rely solely on
advertising in local newspapers to announce public meetings
and other opportunities for public involvement. Since there
may be large sectors of the population who do not read the
local press, the audience reached may be limited. Therefore,
alternative advertising methods should be used whenever
possible, including radio or television spots, postings at bus or
subway stops, announcements in neighborhood newsletters,
announcements at civic organization meetings, distribution
of flyers, mass mailings, door-to-door visits, telephone
notifications, and multilingual announcements. These efforts,
of course, are tied closely to the efforts for the public education
and outreach minimum control measure (see Fact Sheet 2.3).
In addition, advertising and soliciting for help should be targeted
at specific population sectors, including ethnic, minority, and
low-income communities; academia and educational institutions;
neighborhood and community groups; outdoor recreation groups;
and business and industry. The goal is to involve a diverse
cross-section of people who can offer a multitude of concerns,
ideas, and connections during the program development process.
Possible Practices (BMPs)
There are a variety of practices that could be incorporated into
a public participation and involvement program, such as:
|
|
| • | Public meetings/citizen panels allow citizens to discuss various viewpoints and provide input concerning appropriate storm water management policies and BMPs; |
| • | Volunteer water quality monitoring gives citizens firsthand knowledge of the quality of local water bodies and provides a cost-effective means of collecting water quality data; |
| • | Volunteer educators/speakers who can conduct workshops, encourage public participation, and staff special events; |
| • | Storm drain stenciling is an important and simple activity that concerned citizens, especially students, can do; |
| • | Community clean-ups along local waterways, beaches, and around storm drains; |
| • | Citizen watch groups can aid local enforcement authorities in the identification of polluters; and |
| • | "Adopt A Storm Drain" programs encourage individuals or groups to keep storm drains free of debris and to monitor what is entering local waterways through storm drains. | |
What Are Appropriate Measurable Goals?
Measurable goals, which are required for each minimum
control measure, are intended to gauge permit compliance
and program effectiveness. The measurable goals, as well as the
BMPs, greatly depend on the needs and characteristics of the
operator and the area served by the small MS4. Furthermore,
they should be chosen using an integrated approach that fully
addresses the requirements and intent of the minimum control
measure. An integrated approach for this minimum measure
could include the following measurable goals:
|
|
|
|
| Target Date | Activity
|
| 1 year: | Notice of a public meeting in several different print media and bilingual flyers; citizen panel established; volunteers organized to locate outfalls/illicit discharges and stencil drains. |
| 2 years: | Final recommendations of the citizen panel; radio spots promoting program and participation. |
| 3 years: | A certain percentage of the community participating in community clean-ups. |
| 4 years: | Citizen watch groups established in a certain percentage of neighborhoods; outreach to every different population sector completed. |
|
|
| Top of Page |
|
|
2.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
|
Requirements:
Recognizing the adverse effects illicit discharges can have
on receiving waters, the final rule requires an operator of
a regulated small MS4 to develop, implement and enforce an
illicit discharge detection and elimination program. This
program must include the following:
|
|
| • | A storm sewer system map, showing the location of all outfalls and the names and location of all waters of the United States that receive discharges from those outfalls; |
| • | Through an ordinance, or other regulatory mechanism, a prohibition (to the extent allowable under State or local law) on non-storm water discharges into the MS4, and appropriate enforcement procedures and actions; |
| • | A plan to detect and address non-storm water discharges, including illegal dumping, into the MS4; |
| • | The education of public employees, businesses, and the general public about the hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste; and |
| • | The determination of appropriate best management practices (BMPs) and measurable goals for this minimum control measure. Some program implementation approaches, BMPs (i.e., the program actions/activities), and measurable goals are suggested below. |
|
Does This Measure Need to Address All Illicit Discharges?
No. The illicit discharge detection and elimination
program does not need to address the following
categories of non-storm water discharges or flows unless the
operator of the regulated small MS4 identifies them as
significant contributors of pollutants to its MS4:
|
| • | Water line flushing; |
| • | Landscape irrigation; |
| • | Diverted stream flows; |
| • | Rising ground waters; |
| • | Uncontaminated ground water infiltration; |
| • | Uncontaminated pumped ground water; |
| • | Discharges from potable water sources; |
| • | Foundation drains; |
| • | Air conditioning condensation; |
| • | Irrigation water; |
| • | Springs; |
| • | Water from crawl space pumps; |
| • | Footing drains; |
| • | Lawn watering; |
| • | Individual residential car washing; |
| • | Flows from riparian habitats and wetlands; |
| • | Dechlorinated swimming pool discharges; and |
| • | Street wash water. |
|
What Are Some Guidelines for Developing and Implementing This Measure?
The objective of the illicit discharge detection and
elimination minimum control measure is to have
regulated small MS4 operators gain a thorough awareness of
their systems. This awareness allows them to determine the
types and sources of illicit discharges entering their system;
and establish the legal, technical, and educational means
needed to eliminate these discharges. Permittees could meet
these objectives in a variety of ways depending on their
individual needs and abilities, but some general guidance for
each requirement is provided below.
The Map
The storm sewer system map is meant to demonstrate a basic
awareness of the intake and discharge areas of the system.
It is needed to help determine the extent of discharged dry
weather flows, the possible sources of the dry weather flows,
and the particular waterbodies these flows may be affecting.
An existing map, such as a topographical map, on which the
location of major pipes and outfalls can be clearly presented
demonstrates such awareness.
EPA recommends collecting all existing information on
outfall locations (e.g., review city records, drainage maps,
storm drain maps), and then conducting field surveys to
verify locations. It probably will be necessary to walk
(i.e., wade through small receiving waters or use a boat for
larger waters) the streambanks and shorelines for visual
observation. More than one trip may be needed to locate all
outfalls.
Legal Prohibition and Enforcement
EPA recognizes that some permittees may have limited
authority under State or local law to establish and
enforce an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism
prohibiting illicit discharges. In such a case, the permittee is
encouraged to obtain the necessary authority, if possible.
The Plan
The plan to detect and address illicit discharges is the central
component of this minimum control measure. The plan is
dependant upon several factors, including the permittee's
available resources, size of staff, and degree and character of
its illicit discharges. As guidance only, the
four steps of a recommended plan are outlined below:
|
| 1. | Locate Problem Areas |
| EPA recommends that priority areas be identified for
detailed screening of the system based on the likelihood
of illicit connections (e.g., areas with older sanitary sewer
lines). Methods that can locate problem areas include:
public complaints; visual screening; water sampling from
manholes and outfalls during dry weather; and use of
infrared and thermal photography.
|
| 2. | Find the Source |
| Once a problem area or discharge is found, additional
efforts usually are necessary to determine the source of the
problem. Methods that can find the source of the illicit
discharge include: dye-testing buildings in problem areas;
dye- or smoke-testing buildings at the time of sale; tracing
the discharge upstream in the storm sewer; employing a
certification program that shows that buildings have
been checked for illicit connections; implementing an
inspection program of existing septic systems; and using
video to inspect the storm sewers.
|
| 3. | Remove/Correct Illicit Connections |
| Once the source is identified, the offending discharger
should be notified and directed to correct the problem.
Education efforts and working with the discharger can be
effective in resolving the problem before taking legal
action.
|
| 4. | Document Actions Taken |
| As a final step, all actions taken under the plan should
be documented. This illustrates that progress is being
made to eliminate illicit connections and discharges.
Documented actions should be included in annual reports
and include information such as: the number of outfalls
screened; any complaints received and corrected; the
number of discharges and quantities of flow eliminated;
and the number of dye or smoke tests conducted.
|
|
Educational Outreach
Outreach to public employees, businesses, property owners,
the general community, and elected officials regarding ways
to detect and eliminate illicit discharges is an integral part of
this minimum measure that will help gain support for the
permittee's storm water program. Suggested educational
outreach efforts include: |
| • | Developing informative brochures, and guidances
for specific audiences (e.g., carpet cleaning
businesses) and school curricula;
|
| • | Designing a program to publicize and facilitate public
reporting of illicit discharges; |
| • | Coordinating volunteers for locating, and visually
inspecting, outfalls or to stencil storm drains; and |
| • | Initiating recycling programs for commonly dumped
wastes, such as motor oil, antifreeze, and pesticides. |
|
What Are Appropriate Measurable Goals?
Measurable goals, which are required for each minimum
control measure, are intended to gauge permit
compliance and program effectiveness. The measurable
goals, as well as the BMPs, should reflect the needs and
characteristics of the operator and the area served by its
small MS4. Furthermore, they should be chosen using an
integrated approach that fully addresses the requirements
and intent of the minimum control measure. An integrated
approach for this minimum measure could include the
following measurable goals:
|
|
|
|
| Target Date | Activity
|
| 1 year: | Sewer system map completed; recycling program for household hazardous waste in place. |
| 2 years: | Ordinance in place; training for public employees completed; a certain percentage of sources of illicit discharges determined. |
| 3 years: | A certain percentage of illicit discharges detected; illicit discharges eliminated; and households participating in quarterly household hazardous waste special collection days. |
| 4 years: | Most illicit discharge sources detected and eliminated. |
|
The educational outreach measurable goals for this minimum
control measure could be combined with the measurable
goals for the Public Education and Outreach minimum
control measure (see Fact Sheet 2.3). |
|
| Top of Page |
|
|
2.6 Construction Site Runoff Control
|
For supporting materials to assist with this measure please see the
|
Requirements:
The Phase II Final Rule requires an operator of a regulated small MS4 to develop, implement,
and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in storm water runoff to their MS4 from
construction activities that result in a land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre.
The small MS4 operator is required to:
|
|
| • | Have an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism requiring the implementation of proper erosion and sediment controls, and controls for other wastes, on applicable construction sites; |
| • | Have procedures for site plan review of construction plans that consider potential water quality impacts; |
| • | Have procedures for site inspection and enforcement of control measures; |
| • | Have sanctions to ensure compliance (established in the ordinance or other regulatory mechanism); |
| • | Establish procedures for the receipt and consideration of information submitted by the public; and |
| • | Determine the appropriate best management practices (BMPs) and measurable goals for this minimum control measure. Suggested BMPs (i.e., the program actions/activities) and measurable goals are presented below. |
|
What Are Some Guidelines for Developing and Implementing This Measure?
Further explanation and guidance for each component of a
regulated small MS4's construction program is provided
below.
Regulatory Mechanism
Through the development of an ordinance or other regulatory
mechanism, the small MS4 operator must establish a
construction program that controls polluted runoff from
construction sites with a land disturbance of greater than
or equal to one acre. Because there may be limitations on
regulatory legal authority, the small MS4 operator is required
to satisfy this minimum control measure only to the maximum
extent practicable and allowable under State, Tribal, or local
law.
Site Plan Review
The small MS4 operator must include in its construction
program requirements for the implementation of appropriate
BMPs on construction sites to control erosion and sediment
and other waste at the site. To determine if a construction site
is in compliance with such provisions, the small MS4 operator
should review the site plans submitted by the construction site
operator before ground is broken.
Site plan review aids in compliance and enforcement efforts
since it alerts the small MS4 operator early in the process to
the planned use or non-use of proper BMPs and provides a
way to track new construction activities. The tracking of sites
is useful not only for the small MS4 operator's recordkeeping
and reporting purposes, which are required under their
NPDES storm water permit (see Fact Sheet 2.9), but also for
members of the public interested in ensuring that the sites are
in compliance.
Inspections and Penalties
Once construction commences, BMPs should be in place and
the small MS4 operator's enforcement activities should begin.
To ensure that the BMPs are properly installed, the small MS4
operator is required to develop procedures for site inspection
and enforcement of control measures to deter infractions.
Procedures could include steps to identify priority sites for
inspection and enforcement based on the nature and extent of
the construction activity, topography, and the characteristics of
soils and receiving water quality. Inspections give the MS4
operator an opportunity to provide additional guidance and
education, issue warnings, or assess penalties. To conserve
staff resources, one possible option for small MS4 operators is
to have these inspections performed by the same inspector that
visits the sites to check compliance with health and safety
building codes.
Information Submitted by the Public
A final requirement of the small MS4 program for
construction activity is the development of procedures for the
receipt and consideration of public inquiries, concerns, and
information submitted regarding local construction activities.
This provision is intended to further reinforce the public
participation component of the regulated small MS4 storm
water program (see Fact Sheet 2.4) and to recognize the
crucial role that the public can play in identifying instances
of noncompliance.
The small MS4 operator is required only to consider the
information submitted, and may not need to follow-up and
respond to every complaint or concern. Although some form
of enforcement action or reply is not required, the small MS4
operator is required to demonstrate acknowledgment and
consideration of the information submitted. A simple tracking
process in which submitted public information, both written
and verbal, is recorded and then given to the construction site
inspector for possible follow-up will suffice.
|
What Are Appropriate Measurable Goals?
Measurable goals, which are required for each minimum
control measure, are intended to gauge permit
compliance and program effectiveness. The measurable
goals, as well as the BMPs, should reflect the needs and
characteristics of the operator and the area served by its small
MS4. Furthermore, they should be chosen using an integrated
approach that fully addresses the requirements and intent of
the minimum control measure. An integrated approach for
this minimum measure could include the following measurable
goals:
|
|
|
|
| Target Date | Activity
|
| 1 year: | Ordinance or other regulatory mechanism in place; procedures for information submitted by the public in place. |
| 2 years: | Procedures for site inspections implemented; a certain percentage rate of compliance achieved by construction operators. |
| 3 years: | Maximum compliance with ordinance; improved clarity and reduced sedimentation of local waterbodies. |
| 4 years: | Increased numbers of sensitive aquatic organisms in local waterbodies. |
|
Are Construction Sites Already Covered Under the NPDES Storm Water Program?
Yes. EPA's Phase I NPDES storm water program requires
operators of construction activities that disturb five or
more acres to obtain a NPDES construction storm water
permit. General permit requirements include the submission
of a Notice of Intent and the development of a storm water
pollution prevention plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP must
include a site description and measures and controls to prevent
or minimize pollutants in storm water discharges. The
Phase II Final Rule similarly regulates discharges from smaller
construction sites disturbing equal to or greater than one acre
and less than five acres (see Fact Sheet 3.0 for information on
the Phase II construction program).
Even though all construction sites that disturb more than one
acre are covered nationally by an NPDES storm water permit,
the construction site runoff control minimum measure for the
small MS4 program is needed to induce more localized site
regulation and enforcement efforts, and to enable operators of
regulated small MS4s to more effectively control construction
site discharges into their MS4s.
To aid operators of regulated construction sites in their efforts
to comply with both local requirements and their NPDES
permit, the Phase II Final Rule includes a provision that allows
the NPDES permitting authority to reference a "qualifying
State, Tribal or local program" in the NPDES general permit
for construction. This means that if a construction site is
located in an area covered by a qualifying local program, then
the construction site operator's compliance with the local
program constitutes compliance with their NPDES permit. A
regulated small MS4's storm water program for construction
could be a "qualifying program" if the MS4 operator requires
a SWPPP, in addition to the requirements summarized in this
fact sheet.
The ability to reference other programs in the NPDES permit
is intended to reduce confusion between overlapping and
similar requirements, while still providing for both local and
national regulatory coverage of the construction site. The
provision allowing NPDES permitting authorities to reference
other programs has no impact on, or direct relation to, the
small MS4 operator's responsibilities under the construction
site runoff control minimum measure profiled here.
Is a Small MS4 Required to Regulate Construction Sites that the Permitting Authority has Waived from the NPDES Construction Program?
No. If the NPDES permitting authority waives
requirements for storm water discharges associated with
small construction activity, the small
MS4 operator is not required to develop, implement, and/or
enforce a program to reduce pollutant discharges from such
construction sites.
|
|
| Top of Page |
|
|
2.7 Post-Construction Runoff Control
|
For supporting materials to assist with this measure please see the
|
Requirements:
The Phase II Final Rule requires an operator of a regulated small MS4 to develop, implement, and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in post-construction runoff to their MS4 from new development and redevelopment projects that result in the land disturbance of greater than or equal to 1 acre. The small MS4 operator is required to:
|
|
| • | Develop and implement strategies which include a combination of structural and/or nonstructural best management practices (BMPs); |
| • | Have an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism requiring the implementation of postconstruction runoff controls to the extent allowable under State or local law, |
| • | Ensure adequate long-term operation and maintenance of controls; |
| • | Determine the appropriate best management practices (BMPs) and measurable goals for this minimum control measure. |
|
What Is Considered a "Redevelopment" Project?
The term "redevelopment" refers to alterations of a property that change the "footprint" of a site or building in such a way that there is a disturbance of equal to or greater than 1 acre of land. The term does not include such activities as exterior remodeling. Because redevelopment projects may have site constraints not found on new development sites, the rule provides flexibility for implementing post-construction controls on redevelopment sites that consider these constraints.
| What Are Some Guidelines for Developing and Implementing This Measure?
This section includes some sample non-structural and structural BMPs that could be used to satisfy the requirements of the post-construction runoff control minimum measure. It is important to recognize that many BMPs are climate-specific, and not all BMPs are appropriate in every geographic area. Because the requirements of this measure are closely tied to the requirements of the construction site runoff control minimum measure (see Fact Sheet 2.6), EPA recommends that small MS4 operators develop and implement these two measures in tandem. Sample BMPs follow.
|
| Non-Structural BMPs |
| • | Planning and Procedures. |
| Runoff problems can be addressed efficiently with sound planning procedures. Master Plans, Comprehensive Plans, and zoning ordinances can promote improved water quality by guiding the growth of a community away from sensitive areas and by restricting certain types of growth (industrial, for example) to areas that can support it without compromising water quality. |
| • | Site-Based Local Controls |
| These controls can include buffer strip and riparian zone preservation, minimization of disturbance and imperviousness, and maximization of open space. |
| Structural BMPs |
| • | Storage Practices |
| Storage or detention BMPs control storm water by gathering runoff in wet ponds, dry basins, or multichamber catch basins and slowly releasing it to receiving waters or drainage systems. These practices both control storm water volume and settle out particulates for pollutant removal. |
| • | Infiltration Practices |
| Infiltration BMPs are designed to facilitate the percolation of runoff through the soil to ground water, and, thereby, result in reduced storm water quantity and reduced mobilization of pollutants. Examples include infiltration basins/trenches, dry wells, and porous pavement. |
| • | Vegetative Practices |
| Vegetative BMPs are landscaping features that, with optimal design and good soil conditions, enhance pollutant removal, maintain/improve natural site hydrology, promote healthier habitats, and increase aesthetic appeal. Examples include grassy swales, filter strips, artificial wetlands, and rain gardens. |
|
What Are Appropriate Measurable Goals?
Measurable goals, which are required for each minimum control measure, are intended to gauge permit compliance and program effectiveness. The measurable goals, as well as the BMPs, should reflect needs and characteristics of the operator and the area served by its small MS4. Furthermore, the measurable goals should be chosen using an integrated approach that fully addresses the requirements and intent of the minimum control measure. An integrated approach for this minimum measure could include the following goals:
|
|
|
|
| Target Date | Activity
|
| 1 year: | Strategies developed that include structural and/or non-structural BMPs. |
| 2 years: | Strategies codified by use of ordinance or other regulatory mechanism. |
| 3 years: | Reduced percent of new impervious surfaces associated with new development projects. |
| 4 years: | Improved clarity and reduced sedimentation of local waterbodies. |
|
|
| Top of Page |
|
|
2.8 Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping
|
Requirements:
Recognizing the benefits of pollution prevention practices, the rule requires an operator of a regulated small MS4 to: |
|
| • | Develop and implement an operation and maintenance program with the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations into the storm sewer system; |
| • | Include employee training on how to incorporate pollution prevention/good housekeeping techniques into municipal operations such as park and open space maintenance, fleet and building maintenance, new construction and land disturbances, and storm water system maintenance. To minimize duplication of effort and conserve resources, the MS4 operator can use training materials that are available from the U.S. EPA or the NYS DEC; |
| • | Determine the appropriate best management practices (BMPs) and measurable goals for this minimum control measure. Some program implementation approaches, BMPs (i.e., the program actions/activities), and measurable goals are suggested below. |
|
What Are Some Guidelines for Developing and Implementing This Measure?
The intent of this control measure is to ensure that existing municipal, State or Federal operations are performed in ways that will minimize contamination of storm water discharges. EPA encourages the small MS4 operator to consider the following components when developing their program for this measure:
|
| • | Maintenance activities, maintenance schedules, and long-term inspection procedures for structural and non-structural controls to reduce floatables and other pollutants discharged from the separate storm sewers; |
| • | Controls for reducing or eliminating the discharge of pollutants from areas such as roads and parking lots, maintenance and storage yards (including salt/sand storage and snow disposal areas), and waste transfer stations. These controls could include programs that promote recycling (to reduce litter), minimize pesticide use, and ensure the proper disposal of animal waste; |
| • | Procedures for the proper disposal of waste removed from separate storm sewer systems and areas listed in the bullet above, including dredge spoil, accumulated sediments, floatables, and other debris; and |
| • | Ways to ensure that new flood management projects assess the impacts on water quality and examine existing projects for incorporation of additional water quality protection devices or practices. EPA encourages coordination with flood control managers for the purpose of identifying and addressing environmental impacts from such projects. |
|
The effective performance of this control measure hinges on the proper maintenance of the BMPs used, particularly for the first two bullets above. For example, structural controls, such as grates on outfalls to capture floatables, typically need regular cleaning, while non-structural controls, such as training materials and recycling programs, need periodic updating.
|
What Are Appropriate Measurable Goals?
Measurable goals, which are required for each minimum control measure, are meant to gauge permit compliance and program effectiveness. The measurable goals, as well as the BMPs, should consider the needs and characteristics of the operator and the area served by its small MS4. The measurable goals should be chosen using an integrated approach that fully addresses the requirements and intent of the minimum control measure. An integrated approach for this minimum measure could include the following measurable goals:
|
|
|
|
| Target Date | Activity
|
| 1 year: | Pollution prevention plan (the new BMPs and revised procedures) completed; employee training materials gathered or developed; procedures in place for catch basin cleaning after each storm and regular street sweeping. |
| 2 years: | Training for appropriate employees completed; recycling program fully implemented. |
| 3 years: | Some pollution prevention BMPs incorporated into master plan; a certain percentage reduction in pesticide and sand/salt use; maintenance schedule for BMPs established. |
| 4 years: | A certain percentage reduction in floatables discharged; a certain compliance rate with maintenance schedules for BMPs; controls in place for all areas of concern. |
|
|
| Top of Page |
|
|
MS4 Forms
Below are the links to the initial General Permit for Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) and Notice of Intent that were required to be submitted by March 10, 2003. |
General Permit (GP-02-02)
Notice of Intent
|
In order to assess progress toward the full implementation of an appropriate stormwater management plan, MS4 communities are required to submit an Annual Report form with a Municipal Compliance Certification. Below are the instructions to the Annual Report, and the Annual Report form.
|
Years 3-5 Annual Report Instruction Packet
Adobe PDF Format
|
Years 3-5 Annual Report Form with Municipal Compliance Certification
Microsoft Word Format
|
Years 1 & 2 Annual Report Instructions
Microsoft Word Format
Corel Wordperfect Format
Adobe PDF Format
|
Years 1 & 2 Annual Report Form
Microsoft Word Format
Microsoft Excel Format
Corel Wordperfect Format
Adobe PDF Format
|
Years 1 & 2 Municipal Compliance Certification Form
Microsoft Word Format
Corel Wordperfect Format
Adobe PDF Format
| Top of Page |
|
| |